22

Mar 2011

What we’ve learned.

Posted in Blogging | 3 Comments »

Well, it’s been a big rush, but after a brief chat today, me and Jason have accepted that convincing the many, many people who viewed the video of his proposal to fiancée Stephanie to actually vote for the happy couple to enjoy a free, luxury honeymoon was just too difficult. The three of us made an effort to make this work, but unfortunately there are some people out there who have colossal resources when it comes to click-happy online friends who don’t mind a five-minutes-or-less registration process when voting for someone they care about.

I commented earlier today that it says a lot about people when there’s 4,104 views on the counter, and only 570 votes. Sure, there were quite a lot of people who would’ve viewed it to double check (I probably account for almost a hundred visits to that page, not so sure about views though) but that’s not the point. It’s, if anything, a commentary on how unwilling some people are to spend a few minutes registering or logging in via Facebook to help a friend towards their dream honeymoon.

Am I disappointed that our little Twitter and Facebook campaign failed? Yeah, of course I am, and I feel bad knowing Jason and Stephanie are going to have to work out what they’ll do instead. But it’s taught me that there’s a lot more to social media campaigns than I previously believed. You can’t just say “jump” and expect trampolines. You need to own a few, first. Internet users are like children – if you want something from them, you have to give them an incentive and a means to claim their reward all within a minute or less, or they lose interest.

I don’t know if I’ll ever do a Twitter campaign of this kind again, but I will say that it was definitely nice to use a few tools to help someone and make them happy. I think you can offer a lot to someone in today’s economy – vouchers for HMV could be domain-name registrations, if you’re geeky enough. But a nice wedding present would’ve been the honeymoon. For anyone who’s been following the progress on this blog, don’t lose heart, because it is possible for these things to work. You’ve just got to really take it on as a full-time job, and that’s something neither myself nor the happy couple were able to do.

Until the next time, and once again – congratulations to a happy couple who may not have won, but are still happily planning a wedding and the rest of their lives together, because the latter is really the thing that matters.

GD Star Rating
loading...
What we've learned., 3.3 out of 10 based on 4 ratings

3 Responses to “What we’ve learned.”

  1. sean says:

    “me and Jason”???
    “immersed in literature”???
    presumably in some language other than English.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  2. As an English graduate, I’d argue that yes, you can be immersed in literature. As for “me and Jason”, yes, technically, it’s a grammatical error, but so’s spelling your first name without a capital letter. We’ll live.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. mimi says:

    Oops, sorry, wanted to vote for you comment Christos and, instead, voted for Sean’s lame one… Sorry.
    Keep up the good work. Trying and failing is the way we learn, always miles ahead of not doing anything.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

*

More Digital
Bridge House, London Bridge, London, SE1 9QR. United Kingdom.

+44 (0)870 766 2480